You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quercetin and doxorubicin co-delivery using mesoporous silica nanoparticles enhance the efficacy of gastric carcinoma chemotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s170862 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian Fang, Shangwu Zhang, Xiaofeng Xue, Xinguo Zhu, Shiduo Song, Bin Wang, Linhua Jiang, Mingde Qin, Hansi Liang, Ling Gao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
Chemistry | 8 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,087
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,802
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.