↓ Skip to main content

Constructing classification boundaries in the memory clinic: negotiating risk and uncertainty in constituting mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constructing classification boundaries in the memory clinic: negotiating risk and uncertainty in constituting mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, November 2019
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Swallow

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,207,452
of 13,941,162 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#359
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,776
of 240,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.