↓ Skip to main content

A novel virus genome discovered in an extreme environment suggests recombination between unrelated groups of RNA and DNA viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 492)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel virus genome discovered in an extreme environment suggests recombination between unrelated groups of RNA and DNA viruses
Published in
Biology Direct, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-7-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey S Diemer, Kenneth M Stedman

Abstract

Viruses are known to be the most abundant organisms on earth, yet little is known about their collective origin and evolutionary history. With exceptionally high rates of genetic mutation and mosaicism, it is not currently possible to resolve deep evolutionary histories of the known major virus groups. Metagenomics offers a potential means of establishing a more comprehensive view of viral evolution as vast amounts of new sequence data becomes available for comparative analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 232 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 23%
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 18 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 29 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#262,882
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#5
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,365
of 247,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.