↓ Skip to main content

Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008693.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan PV Carvalho, Flávia MR Vital, Bernardo GO Soares

Abstract

Shoulder dysfunction is a common problem in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Both neck dissections and radiotherapy can cause morbidity to the shoulder joint. Exercise interventions have been suggested as a treatment option for this population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 26%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Unspecified 18 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 19%
Unspecified 26 18%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,982,035
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,109
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,368
of 118,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.