↓ Skip to main content

Dualization and Electoral Realignment

Overview of attention for article published in Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 276)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Dualization and Electoral Realignment
Published in
Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/psrm.2018.48
Authors

Häusermann, Silja

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 83%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#797,097
of 13,927,844 outputs
Outputs from Political Science Research and Methods
#45
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,988
of 234,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Science Research and Methods
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.