↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous & Mini Invasive Achilles tendon repair
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1758-2555-3-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R Carmont, Roberto Rossi, Sven Scheffler, Omer Mei-Dan, Philippe Beaufils

Abstract

Rupture of the Achilles tendon is a considerable cause of morbidity with reduced function following injury. Recent studies have shown little difference in outcome between the techniques of open and non-operative treatment using an early active rehabilitation programme. Meta-analyses have shown that non-operative management has increased risk of re-rupture whereas surgical intervention has risks of complications related to the wound and iatrogenic nerve injury. Minimally invasive surgery has been adopted as a way of reducing infections rates and wound breakdown however avoiding iatrogenic nerve injury must be considered. We discuss the techniques and outcomes of percutaneous and minimally invasive repairs of the Achilles tendon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 23%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#465
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,839
of 153,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.