↓ Skip to main content

Cross-Dimensional Mapping of Number, Length and Brightness by Preschool Children

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-Dimensional Mapping of Number, Length and Brightness by Preschool Children
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Dolores de Hevia, Monica Vanderslice, Elizabeth S. Spelke

Abstract

Human adults in diverse cultures, children, infants, and non-human primates relate number to space, but it is not clear whether this ability reflects a specific and privileged number-space mapping. To investigate this possibility, we tested preschool children in matching tasks where the dimensions of number and length were mapped both to one another and to a third dimension, brightness. Children detected variation on all three dimensions, and they reliably performed mappings between number and length, and partially between brightness and length, but not between number and brightness. Moreover, children showed reliably better mapping of number onto the dimension of length than onto the dimension of brightness. These findings suggest that number establishes a privileged mapping with the dimension of length, and that other dimensions, including brightness, can be mapped onto length, although less efficiently. Children's adeptness at number-length mappings suggests that these two dimensions are intuitively related by the end of the preschool years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 66%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2012.
All research outputs
#16,237,186
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,860
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,487
of 174,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,137
of 3,759 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,759 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.