You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Compensation of subjects for participation in biomedical research in resource – limited settings: a discussion of practices in Malawi
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0422-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wongani Nyangulu, Randy Mungwira, Nginanche Nampota, Osward Nyirenda, Lufina Tsirizani, Edson Mwinjiwa, Titus Divala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malawi | 10 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
Scientists | 7 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 34 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,694,385
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#158
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,912
of 358,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.