↓ Skip to main content

Large-Scale Absence of Sharks on Reefs in the Greater-Caribbean: A Footprint of Human Pressures

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-Scale Absence of Sharks on Reefs in the Greater-Caribbean: A Footprint of Human Pressures
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine A. Ward-Paige, Camilo Mora, Heike K. Lotze, Christy Pattengill-Semmens, Loren McClenachan, Ery Arias-Castro, Ransom A. Myers

Abstract

In recent decades, large pelagic and coastal shark populations have declined dramatically with increased fishing; however, the status of sharks in other systems such as coral reefs remains largely unassessed despite a long history of exploitation. Here we explore the contemporary distribution and sighting frequency of sharks on reefs in the greater-Caribbean and assess the possible role of human pressures on observed patterns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Mozambique 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 425 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 19%
Researcher 83 18%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Other 20 4%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 63 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 227 50%
Environmental Science 112 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 75 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,024,901
of 25,084,886 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,274
of 217,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,872
of 100,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 775 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,084,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 775 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.