↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006560.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, O'Dowd T, Smith, Susan M, Soubhi, Hassan, Fortin, Martin, Hudon, Catherine, O'Dowd, Tom

Abstract

Many people with chronic disease have more than one chronic condition, which is referred to as multimorbidity. While this is not a new phenomenon, there is greater recognition of its impact and the importance of improving outcomes for individuals affected. Research in the area to date has focused mainly on descriptive epidemiology and impact assessment. There has been limited exploration of the effectiveness of interventions for multimorbidity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Spain 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 306 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Unspecified 29 9%
Other 112 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 13%
Unspecified 45 13%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Psychology 22 6%
Other 36 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,045,384
of 13,560,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,168
of 10,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,762
of 121,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.