You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Librarian Leading the Machine: A Reassessment of Library Instruction Methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
College & Research Libraries, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5860/crl.77.3.286 |
| Authors |
Katie Greer, Amanda Nichols Hess, Elizabeth W. Kraemer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 71 | 55% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 36% |
| Arts and Humanities | 17 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,140,637
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from College & Research Libraries
#282
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,052
of 311,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from College & Research Libraries
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.