↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008602.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gray K, Pacey V, Gibbons P, Little D, Frost C, Burns J, Gray, Kelly, Pacey, Verity, Gibbons, Paul, Little, David, Frost, Chris, Burns, Joshua

Abstract

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), which is also known as clubfoot, is a common congenital orthopaedic condition. It is characterised by an excessively turned in foot (equinovarus) and high medial longitudinal arch (cavus). If left untreated it can result in long-term disability, deformity and pain. Interventions can be conservative (such as splinting or stretching) or surgical.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,562,065
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,777
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,707
of 108,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.