↓ Skip to main content

The potential for polyphosphate metabolism in Archaea and anaerobic polyphosphate formation in Methanosarcina mazei

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential for polyphosphate metabolism in Archaea and anaerobic polyphosphate formation in Methanosarcina mazei
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53168-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana S. Paula, Jason P. Chin, Anna Schnürer, Bettina Müller, Panagiotis Manesiotis, Nicholas Waters, Katrina A. Macintosh, John P. Quinn, Jasmine Connolly, Florence Abram, John W. McGrath, Vincent O’Flaherty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 30%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,126,771
of 18,247,290 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,922
of 98,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,875
of 411,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,676
of 14,678 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,247,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14,678 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.