↓ Skip to main content

Holocene Rupture History of the Central Teton Fault at Leigh Lake, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,689)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Holocene Rupture History of the Central Teton Fault at Leigh Lake, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming
Published in
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, November 2019
DOI 10.1785/0120190129
Authors

Mark S. Zellman, Christopher B. DuRoss, Glenn D. Thackray, Stephen F. Personius, Nadine G. Reitman, Shannon A. Mahan, Cooper C. Brossy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 50%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#561,752
of 23,666,535 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#41
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,999
of 460,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.