You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Give the trauma patient what they bleed, when and where they need it: establishing a comprehensive regional system of resuscitation based on patient need utilizing cold‐stored, low‐titer O+ whole blood
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transfusion, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1111/trf.15264 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline S. Zhu, Douglas M. Pokorny, Brian J. Eastridge, Susannah E. Nicholson, Eric Epley, Jason Forcum, Tasia Long, David Miramontes, Randall Schaefer, Michael Shiels, Ronald M. Stewart, Michael Stringfellow, Rena Summers, Christopher J. Winckler, Donald H. Jenkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 21% |
Unknown | 34 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Transfusion
#3,309
of 4,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,802
of 368,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transfusion
#49
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.