↓ Skip to main content

High-Throughput High-Resolution Class I HLA Genotyping in East Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Throughput High-Resolution Class I HLA Genotyping in East Africa
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca N. Koehler, Anne M. Walsh, Eric E. Sanders-Buell, Leigh Anne Eller, Michael Eller, Jeffrey R. Currier, Christian T. Bautista, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Michael Hoelscher, Leonard Maboko, Jerome Kim, Nelson L. Michael, Merlin L. Robb, Francine E. McCutchan, Gustavo H. Kijak

Abstract

HLA, the most genetically diverse loci in the human genome, play a crucial role in host-pathogen interaction by mediating innate and adaptive cellular immune responses. A vast number of infectious diseases affect East Africa, including HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, but the HLA genetic diversity in this region remains incompletely described. This is a major obstacle for the design and evaluation of preventive vaccines. Available HLA typing techniques, that provide the 4-digit level resolution needed to interpret immune responses, lack sufficient throughput for large immunoepidemiological studies. Here we present a novel HLA typing assay bridging the gap between high resolution and high throughput. The assay is based on real-time PCR using sequence-specific primers (SSP) and can genotype carriers of the 49 most common East African class I HLA-A, -B, and -C alleles, at the 4-digit level. Using a validation panel of 175 samples from Kampala, Uganda, previously defined by sequence-based typing, the new assay performed with 100% sensitivity and specificity. The assay was also implemented to define the HLA genetic complexity of a previously uncharacterized Tanzanian population, demonstrating its inclusion in the major East African genetic cluster. The availability of genotyping tools with this capacity will be extremely useful in the identification of correlates of immune protection and the evaluation of candidate vaccine efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 16 21%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#16,452,494
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,444
of 208,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,546
of 97,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#588
of 702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.