↓ Skip to main content

An ethical comparison of living kidney donation and surrogacy: understanding the relational dimension

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 201)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ethical comparison of living kidney donation and surrogacy: understanding the relational dimension
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13010-019-0080-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Beier, Sabine Wöhlke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,382,928
of 18,339,396 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#43
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,056
of 411,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,339,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.