↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley L Høeg, Pernille E Bidstrup, Randi V Karlsen, Anne Sofie Friberg, Vanna Albieri, Susanne O Dalton, Lena Saltbaek, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Trine Allerslev Horsboel, Christoffer Johansen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,100,421
of 15,679,642 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,017
of 11,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,540
of 365,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,679,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.