↓ Skip to main content

How low should we go when warning for earthquakes?

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
62 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How low should we go when warning for earthquakes?
Published in
Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1126/science.aaz6601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth S. Cochran, Allen L. Husker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 25%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#394,041
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Science
#10,688
of 73,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,401
of 416,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#226
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.