↓ Skip to main content

How low should we go when warning for earthquakes?

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
57 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How low should we go when warning for earthquakes?
Published in
Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1126/science.aaz6601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth S Cochran, Allen L Husker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 7 19%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 22%
Engineering 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2021.
All research outputs
#626,187
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Science
#14,003
of 83,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,916
of 474,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#228
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.