↓ Skip to main content

Migrating bison engineer the green wave

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
60 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Migrating bison engineer the green wave
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1913783116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Geremia, Jerod A. Merkle, Daniel R. Eacker, Rick L. Wallen, P. J. White, Mark Hebblewhite, Matthew J. Kauffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 36 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 34%
Environmental Science 45 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 53 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 397. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#44,957
of 18,758,731 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,204
of 91,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,421
of 414,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#37
of 908 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,758,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 908 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.