You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endocrine Surgeon‐Performed US Guided Thyroid FNAC is Accurate and Efficient
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-012-1592-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dhafir Al‐azawi, G. Bruce Mann, Rodney T. Judson, Julie A. Miller |
Abstract |
Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) is a key diagnostic technique used to assess thyroid nodules. This procedure has been the domain of radiologists, but it is increasingly performed by endocrine surgeons. In the present study we aimed to assess the accuracy and clinical efficiency of US-FNAC performed by endocrine surgeons. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 75% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,453
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,869
of 161,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.