You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long‐term GnRH agonist therapy before in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for improving fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013240.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ektoras X Georgiou, Pedro Melo, Philip E Baker, Hassan N Sallam, Aydin Arici, Juan A Garcia-Velasco, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Christian Becker, Ingrid E Granne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 99 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 111 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,323,644
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,060
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,799
of 477,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.