↓ Skip to main content

A potential new role for ASL perfusion imaging: Diagnosis of metronidazole induced encephalopathy – Two companion cases

Overview of attention for article published in Radiology Case Reports, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A potential new role for ASL perfusion imaging: Diagnosis of metronidazole induced encephalopathy – Two companion cases
Published in
Radiology Case Reports, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.10.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Yedavalli, Bryan Lanzman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,828,447
of 14,088,628 outputs
Outputs from Radiology Case Reports
#104
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,678
of 277,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology Case Reports
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,088,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.