↓ Skip to main content

A potential new role for ASL perfusion imaging: Diagnosis of metronidazole induced encephalopathy – Two companion cases

Overview of attention for article published in Radiology Case Reports, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A potential new role for ASL perfusion imaging: Diagnosis of metronidazole induced encephalopathy – Two companion cases
Published in
Radiology Case Reports, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.10.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Yedavalli, Bryan Lanzman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,711,141
of 14,437,320 outputs
Outputs from Radiology Case Reports
#108
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,366
of 328,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology Case Reports
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,437,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.