↓ Skip to main content

What does it take to provide clinical interventions with temporal consistency? A qualitative study of London hyperacute stroke units

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What does it take to provide clinical interventions with temporal consistency? A qualitative study of London hyperacute stroke units
Published in
BMJ Open, November 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia B Black, Angus I G Ramsay, Abigail Baim-Lance, Jeannie Eng, Mariya Melnychuk, Penny Xanthopoulou, Martin M Brown, Stephen Morris, Anthony G Rudd, Robert Simister, Naomi J Fulop

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Social Sciences 2 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,445,541
of 15,184,829 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,667
of 13,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,700
of 348,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#220
of 677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.