You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What does it take to provide clinical interventions with temporal consistency? A qualitative study of London hyperacute stroke units
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgia B Black, Angus I G Ramsay, Abigail Baim-Lance, Jeannie Eng, Mariya Melnychuk, Penny Xanthopoulou, Martin M Brown, Stephen Morris, Anthony G Rudd, Robert Simister, Naomi J Fulop |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 60% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,576,013
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,254
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,895
of 381,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#288
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.