You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marjolein Gysels, Natalie Evans, Arantza Meñaca, Erin Andrew, Franco Toscani, Sylvia Finetti, H. Roeline Pasman, Irene Higginson, Richard Harding, Robert Pool |
| Abstract |
Culture is becoming increasingly important in relation to end of life (EoL) care in a context of globalization, migration and European integration. We explore and compare socio-cultural issues that shape EoL care in seven European countries and critically appraise the existing research evidence on cultural issues in EoL care generated in the different countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,583,954
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,450
of 196,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,593
of 161,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#733
of 3,719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.