↓ Skip to main content

Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
126 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 424 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Other 23 5%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 165 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 14%
Psychology 15 4%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 184 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#461,593
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#821
of 12,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,462
of 470,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.