You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 15% |
Germany | 15 | 14% |
Australia | 6 | 6% |
United States | 6 | 6% |
Canada | 6 | 6% |
India | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 3 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
Sweden | 2 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 77 | 71% |
Scientists | 23 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 430 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 57 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 49 | 11% |
Researcher | 32 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 5% |
Other | 67 | 16% |
Unknown | 174 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 14% |
Psychology | 15 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 50 | 12% |
Unknown | 193 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#543,766
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#915
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,822
of 480,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.