The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 597 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions Among US Ambulatory Care Visits, 2010-2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2016.4151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra, Adam L. Hersh, Daniel J. Shapiro, Monina Bartoces, Eva A. Enns, Thomas M. File, Jonathan A. Finkelstein, Jeffrey S. Gerber, David Y. Hyun, Jeffrey A. Linder, Ruth Lynfield, David J. Margolis, Larissa S. May, Daniel Merenstein, Joshua P. Metlay, Jason G. Newland, Jay F. Piccirillo, Rebecca M. Roberts, Guillermo V. Sanchez, Katie J. Suda, Ann Thomas, Teri Moser Woo, Rachel M. Zetts, Lauri A. Hicks |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 137 | 23% |
| Spain | 25 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| India | 6 | 1% |
| Ireland | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 52 | 9% |
| Unknown | 324 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 394 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 117 | 20% |
| Scientists | 67 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 146 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 119 | 11% |
| Researcher | 116 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 10% |
| Other | 92 | 8% |
| Other | 245 | 22% |
| Unknown | 290 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 318 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 84 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 4% |
| Other | 191 | 17% |
| Unknown | 353 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,927
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#131
of 37,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 314,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.