You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fish-T1K (Transcriptomes of 1,000 Fishes) Project: large-scale transcriptome data for fish evolution studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-016-0124-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Sun, Yu Huang, Xiaofeng Li, Carole C. Baldwin, Zhuocheng Zhou, Zhixiang Yan, Keith A. Crandall, Yong Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhao, Min Wang, Alex Wong, Chao Fang, Xinhui Zhang, Hai Huang, Jose V. Lopez, Kirk Kilfoyle, Yong Zhang, Guillermo Ortí, Byrappa Venkatesh, Qiong Shi |
| Abstract |
Ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) represent more than 50 % of extant vertebrates and are of great evolutionary, ecologic and economic significance, but they are relatively underrepresented in 'omics studies. Increased availability of transcriptome data for these species will allow researchers to better understand changes in gene expression, and to carry out functional analyses. An international project known as the "Transcriptomes of 1,000 Fishes" (Fish-T1K) project has been established to generate RNA-seq transcriptome sequences for 1,000 diverse species of ray-finned fishes. The first phase of this project has produced transcriptomes from more than 180 ray-finned fishes, representing 142 species and covering 51 orders and 109 families. Here we provide an overview of the goals of this project and the work done so far. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#977,638
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#137
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,745
of 312,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.