↓ Skip to main content

The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoff Hollis, Chris Westbury

Abstract

Notable progress has been made recently on computational models of semantics using vector representations for word meaning (Mikolov, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013; Mikolov, Sutskever, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013). As representations of meaning, recent models presumably hone in on plausible organizational principles for meaning. We performed an analysis on the organization of the skip-gram model's semantic space. Consistent with human performance (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957), the skip-gram model primarily relies on affective distinctions to organize meaning. We showed that the skip-gram model accounts for unique variance in behavioral measures of lexical access above and beyond that accounted for by affective and lexical measures. We also raised the possibility that word frequency predicts behavioral measures of lexical access due to the fact that word use is organized by semantics. Deconstruction of the semantic representations in semantic models has the potential to reveal organizing principles of human semantics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 17 19%
Computer Science 15 17%
Psychology 14 16%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 23 26%