You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sand mining in the Mekong Delta revisited - current scales of local sediment deficits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-53804-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Jordan, Jan Tiede, Oliver Lojek, Jan Visscher, Heiko Apel, Hong Quan Nguyen, Chau Nguyen Xuan Quang, Torsten Schlurmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 17% |
| Engineering | 27 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#492,494
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,439
of 142,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,648
of 480,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#156
of 4,120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.