↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery
Published in
Nature Reviews Endocrinology, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/nrendo.2012.48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bikram S. Bal, Frederick C. Finelli, Timothy R. Shope, Timothy R. Koch

Abstract

Lifestyle intervention programmes often produce insufficient weight loss and poor weight loss maintenance. As a result, an increasing number of patients with obesity and related comorbidities undergo bariatric surgery, which includes approaches such as the adjustable gastric band or the 'divided' Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This Review summarizes the current knowledge on nutrient deficiencies that can develop after bariatric surgery and highlights follow-up and treatment options for bariatric surgery patients who develop a micronutrient deficiency. The major macronutrient deficiency after bariatric surgery is protein malnutrition. Deficiencies in micronutrients, which include trace elements, essential minerals, and water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins, are common before bariatric surgery and often persist postoperatively, despite universal recommendations on multivitamin and mineral supplements. Other disorders, including small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, can promote micronutrient deficiencies, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. Recognition of the clinical presentations of micronutrient deficiencies is important, both to enable early intervention and to minimize long-term adverse effects. A major clinical concern is the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and the development of metabolic bone diseases, such as osteoporosis or osteomalacia; metabolic bone diseases may explain the increased risk of hip fracture in patients after RYGB. Further studies are required to determine the optimal levels of nutrient supplementation and whether postoperative laboratory monitoring effectively detects nutrient deficiencies. In the absence of such data, clinicians should inquire about and treat symptoms that suggest nutrient deficiencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 404 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 15%
Student > Master 56 14%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 8%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 111 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 <1%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 129 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,331,743
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Endocrinology
#855
of 2,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,751
of 176,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Endocrinology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.