↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Kourtesis, Simona Collina, Leonidas A. A. Doumas, Sarah E. MacPherson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 89 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 12%
Psychology 23 11%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 99 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,226,948
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,481
of 7,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,878
of 483,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#16
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.