↓ Skip to main content

Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 35,150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US
Published in
British Medical Journal, May 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i2139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin A Makary , Michael Daniel , Martin A Makary, Michael Daniel, Makary, Martin A, Daniel, Michael

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,916 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 187 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 26 13%
Other 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Other 67 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Computer Science 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 43 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5827. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15
of 8,522,804 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1
of 35,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 272,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,522,804 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.