↓ Skip to main content

IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 421)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IARC 2019: “Night shift work” is probably carcinogenic: What about disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life?
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12995-019-0249-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas C. Erren, Peter Morfeld, J. Valérie Groß, Ursula Wild, Philip Lewis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#176,047
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#2
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,888
of 480,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them