You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors for Congenital Cryptorchidism in a Prospective Birth Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida N. Damgaard, Tina K. Jensen, The Nordic Cryptorchidism Study Group, Jørgen H. Petersen, Niels E. Skakkebæk, Jorma Toppari, Katharina M. Main |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,285,815
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,212
of 195,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,115
of 84,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#125
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.