↓ Skip to main content

Toxoplasma gondii

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Toxoplasma gondii'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 What a Difference 30 Years Makes! A Perspective on Changes in Research Methodologies Used to Study Toxoplasma gondii
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 ToxoDB: Functional Genomics Resource for Toxoplasma and Related Organisms
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation and Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii Strains
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Generation of Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia hammondi Oocysts and Purification of Their Sporozoites for Downstream Manipulation
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Assays for Monitoring Toxoplasma gondii Infectivity in the Laboratory Mouse
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 PCR Screening of Toxoplasma gondii Single Clones Directly from 96-Well Plates Without DNA Purification
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Generation of Tetracycline Repressor-Based Inducible Knockdown in Toxoplasma gondii
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Assessing Rhoptry Secretion in T. gondii
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 High-Throughput Measurement of Microneme Secretion in Toxoplasma gondii
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Plate-Based Quantification of Stimulated Toxoplasma Egress
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genetic Indicators for Calcium Signaling Studies in Toxoplasma gondii
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Phenotyping Toxoplasma Invasive Skills by Fast Live Cell Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Experimental Approaches for Examining Apicoplast Biology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measuring Solute Transport in Toxoplasma gondii Parasites
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Toxoplasma gondii: Bradyzoite Differentiation In Vitro and In Vivo
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Toxoplasma –Neuron Interactions In Situ
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Model Systems for Studying Mechanisms of Ocular Toxoplasmosis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Using BioID for the Identification of Interacting and Proximal Proteins in Subcellular Compartments in Toxoplasma gondii
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Assays to Evaluate Toxoplasma–Macrophage Interactions
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Methods for the Measurement of Early Events in Toxoplasma gondii Immunity in Mouse Cells
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Image-Based Quantitation of Host Cell– Toxoplasma gondii Interplay Using HRMAn: A Host Response to Microbe Analysis Pipeline
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Metabolomic Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Label-Based Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Robust Quantification of the Phosphoproteome and Total Proteome in Toxoplasma gondii
Attention for Chapter 7: CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Generation of Tetracycline Repressor-Based Inducible Knockdown in Toxoplasma gondii
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Generation of Tetracycline Repressor-Based Inducible Knockdown in Toxoplasma gondii
Chapter number 7
Book title
Toxoplasma gondii
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-9857-9_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-9856-2, 978-1-4939-9857-9
Authors

Jacot, Damien, Soldati-Favre, Dominique, Damien Jacot, Dominique Soldati-Favre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 42%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,694,617
of 24,962,233 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,254
of 14,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,750
of 470,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#15
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,962,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.