↓ Skip to main content

Role of Tobacco Use in the Etiology of Acoustic Neuroma

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Tobacco Use in the Etiology of Acoustic Neuroma
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, April 2012
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwr465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadie Palmisano, Judith Schwartzbaum, Michaela Prochazka, David Pettersson, Tommy Bergenheim, Rut Florentzson, Henrik Harder, Tiit Mathiesen, Gunnar Nyberg, Peter Siesjö, Maria Feychting

Abstract

Two previous studies suggest that cigarette smoking reduces acoustic neuroma risk; however, an association between use of snuff tobacco and acoustic neuroma has not been investigated previously. The authors conducted a case-control study in Sweden from 2002 to 2007, in which 451 cases and 710 population-based controls completed questionnaires. Cases and controls were matched on gender, region, and age within 5 years. The authors estimated odds ratios using conditional logistic regression analyses, adjusted for education and tobacco use (snuff use in the smoking analysis and smoking in the snuff analysis). The risk of acoustic neuroma was greatly reduced in male current smokers (odds ratio (OR) = 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23, 0.74) and moderately reduced in female current smokers (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.23). In contrast, current snuff use among males was not associated with risk of acoustic neuroma (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.55). The authors' findings are consistent with previous reports of lower acoustic neuroma risk among current cigarette smokers than among never smokers. The absence of an association between snuff use and acoustic neuroma suggests that some constituent of tobacco smoke other than nicotine may confer protection against acoustic neuroma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#8,084
of 8,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,970
of 174,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#49
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.