You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological networks: Pursuing the shortest path, however narrow and crooked
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-54206-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Costa, Ana M. Martín González, Katell Guizien, Andrea M. Doglioli, José María Gómez, Anne A. Petrenko, Stefano Allesina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 22% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,483,529
of 24,607,331 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#50,387
of 134,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,903
of 469,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,571
of 4,081 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,607,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,081 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.