↓ Skip to main content

Differential expression and predictive value of monocyte scavenger receptor CD163 in populations with different tuberculosis infection statuses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential expression and predictive value of monocyte scavenger receptor CD163 in populations with different tuberculosis infection statuses
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4525-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qianqian Liu, Qinfang Ou, Huaxin Chen, Yan Gao, Yuanyuan Liu, Yuzhen Xu, Qiaoling Ruan, Wenhong Zhang, Lingyun Shao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#11,302,206
of 14,259,275 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,723
of 5,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,794
of 317,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#400
of 622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.