↓ Skip to main content

Eudistoma (Ascidiacea: Polycitoridae) from tropical Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Zoologia, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

2 Wikipedia pages


4 Dimensions

Readers on

30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Eudistoma (Ascidiacea: Polycitoridae) from tropical Brazil
Published in
Zoologia, April 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1984-46702014000200011

Livia de Moura Oliveira, Gustavo Antunes Gamba, Rosana Moreira da Rocha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Professor 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 240,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them