You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing the weight training experience: a comparison of limb kinematics and EMG activity on three machines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-010-1421-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasushi Koyama, Hirofumi Kobayashi, Shuji Suzuki, Roger M. Enoka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,346,657
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#432
of 4,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,355
of 102,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.