↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the proportion of healthier foods available with and without reducing portion sizes and energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing the proportion of healthier foods available with and without reducing portion sizes and energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7927-2
Authors

James P. Reynolds, Daina Kosīte, Brier Rigby Dames, Laura A. Brocklebank, Mark Pilling, Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,199,364
of 14,189,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,385
of 9,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,479
of 307,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 1,164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,189,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.