↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the proportion of healthier foods available with and without reducing portion sizes and energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing the proportion of healthier foods available with and without reducing portion sizes and energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7927-2
Authors

James P. Reynolds, Daina Kosīte, Brier Rigby Dames, Laura A. Brocklebank, Mark Pilling, Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Psychology 4 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,396,543
of 15,556,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,634
of 10,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,250
of 359,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#197
of 1,218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,556,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.