You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of the Köppen–Trewartha climate classification to evaluate climatic refugia in statistically derived ecoregions for the People’s Republic of China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climatic Change, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-009-9622-2 |
Authors |
Barry Baker, Henry Diaz, William Hargrove, Forrest Hoffman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 27 | 31% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,944
of 6,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,402
of 127,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.