↓ Skip to main content

Spatial and Seasonal Distribution of American Whaling and Whales in the Age of Sail

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial and Seasonal Distribution of American Whaling and Whales in the Age of Sail
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim D. Smith, Randall R. Reeves, Elizabeth A. Josephson, Judith N. Lund

Abstract

American whalemen sailed out of ports on the east coast of the United States and in California from the 18(th) to early 20(th) centuries, searching for whales throughout the world's oceans. From an initial focus on sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and right whales (Eubalaena spp.), the array of targeted whales expanded to include bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), and gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus). Extensive records of American whaling in the form of daily entries in whaling voyage logbooks contain a great deal of information about where and when the whalemen found whales. We plotted daily locations where the several species of whales were observed, both those caught and those sighted but not caught, on world maps to illustrate the spatial and temporal distribution of both American whaling activity and the whales. The patterns shown on the maps provide the basis for various inferences concerning the historical distribution of the target whales prior to and during this episode of global whaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 145 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 46%
Environmental Science 35 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#846,139
of 24,671,780 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,279
of 213,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,207
of 167,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#159
of 3,716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,671,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.