You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome re-annotation: a wiki solution?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2007-8-1-102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven L Salzberg |
| Abstract |
The annotation of most genomes becomes outdated over time, owing in part to our ever-improving knowledge of genomes and in part to improvements in bioinformatics software. Unfortunately, annotation is rarely if ever updated and resources to support routine reannotation are scarce. Wiki software, which would allow many scientists to edit each genome's annotation, offers one possible solution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 136 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,654,152
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,358
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,917
of 168,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.