↓ Skip to main content

Spatial and Temporal Trends of Global Pollination Benefit

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
301 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
870 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial and Temporal Trends of Global Pollination Benefit
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven Lautenbach, Ralf Seppelt, Juliane Liebscher, Carsten F. Dormann

Abstract

Pollination is a well-studied and at the same time a threatened ecosystem service. A significant part of global crop production depends on or profits from pollination by animals. Using detailed information on global crop yields of 60 pollination dependent or profiting crops, we provide a map of global pollination benefits on a 5' by 5' latitude-longitude grid. The current spatial pattern of pollination benefits is only partly correlated with climate variables and the distribution of cropland. The resulting map of pollination benefits identifies hot spots of pollination benefits at sufficient detail to guide political decisions on where to protect pollination services by investing in structural diversity of land use. Additionally, we investigated the vulnerability of the national economies with respect to potential decline of pollination services as the portion of the (agricultural) economy depending on pollination benefits. While the general dependency of the agricultural economy on pollination seems to be stable from 1993 until 2009, we see increases in producer prices for pollination dependent crops, which we interpret as an early warning signal for a conflict between pollination service and other land uses at the global scale. Our spatially explicit analysis of global pollination benefit points to hot spots for the generation of pollination benefits and can serve as a base for further planning of land use, protection sites and agricultural policies for maintaining pollination services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 870 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 829 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 165 19%
Researcher 147 17%
Student > Master 142 16%
Student > Bachelor 96 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 4%
Other 119 14%
Unknown 164 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 379 44%
Environmental Science 177 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 1%
Other 61 7%
Unknown 203 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#579,865
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,873
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,678
of 179,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#111
of 3,797 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,797 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.