You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance, and natural seedfall
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, July 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02471966 |
| Authors |
Jonathan M. Friedman, Michael L. Scott, William M. Lewis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,151
of 22,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them