You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primum Non Nocere: An Evolutionary Analysis of Whether Antidepressants Do More Harm than Good
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul W. Andrews, J. Anderson Thomson, Ananda Amstadter, Michael C. Neale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 97 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 175 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 9% |
| Scientists | 19 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 18% |
| Researcher | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 96 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#207,192
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#446
of 34,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#933
of 252,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.