↓ Skip to main content

Institutionalizing Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counselling for Children: An Observational Case Study from Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutionalizing Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counselling for Children: An Observational Case Study from Zambia
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane N. Mutanga, Juliette Raymond, Megan S. Towle, Simon Mutembo, Robert Captain Fubisha, Frank Lule, Lulu Muhe

Abstract

Provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) is a priority strategy for increasing access for HIV-exposed children to prevention measures, and infected children to treatment and care interventions. This article examines efforts to scale-up paediatric PITC at a second-level hospital located in Zambia's Southern Province, and serving a catchment area of 1.2 million people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Botswana 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Social Sciences 20 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,848,273
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,285
of 202,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,716
of 163,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#934
of 3,714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.